| Debt and
the Environment - Who owes what to whom?
Ever since the Industrial Revolution the negative impact of human
activity upon the environment has been very much in evidence. The
latter part of the twentieth century witnessed an acceleration in
the process of environmental destruction. In the southern hemisphere
this process was further exacerbated by the Debt Crisis.
In the 1970s when money from oil revenues was easily available
to developing countries, numerous ecologically disastrous projects
were initiated. By the 1980s, when the debt crisis started, the
International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank (WB) stepped
in with further loans in return for the adoption of Structural Adjustment
Programmes (SAPs). The intention of SAPs is to promote export-led
economic growth, which will enable the repayment of the loans. Exports
earn foreign or hard currency (for example,US$), and external debt
must be paid in hard currency. Exports from developing countries
are usually primary goods such as oil or minerals as well as cash
crops such as bananas, coffee and cocoa. The production of these
goods puts considerable pressure on natural resources and all too
often it is the local people who bear the cost. The damage inflicted
upon their natural habitat results in increased impoverishment and
displacement.
Large-scale mechanised and highly intensive farming practices are
promoted to the detriment of the natural ecosystem. Under SAPs,
small farmers lose their subsidies and support systems such as access
to credit and advice. In the developing world, particularly in sub-Saharan
Africa, the majority of small farmers are women and they have been
the main producers of food crops. Many small farmers have found
themselves unable to survive in a highly competitive environment
where the main emphasis is on high yields in cash crops. The most
fertile land is often allocated to cash crops and most of the agricultural
research is focused on cash crop production. The implications for
food security are very serious. The environment is put under further
pressure as the small farmers who have been forced off their land
burn large areas of forest to grow food for themselves and their
families, this land is not ideal for growing food, but farmers often
have no other options.
|
In Zambia, the Structural Adjustment Programmes
of the IMF and World Bank have led to the closure of
agricultural co-operatives and marketing boards. In
the past these were the mechanisms through which the
Zambian government assisted small farmers. Small farmers
have since found it difficult to access credit, seeds
and fertiliser for maize. The SAP Monitor in Zambia
has found that in 1999, many farmers stopped growing
maize, which is the main stable food in Zambia, and
started growing either cotton or tobacco. Between 1997
and 1999, cotton production in Zambia increased by 47
per cent, while tobacco production increased by 170
per cent. During the same period, the amount of maize
produced did not meet demand. This has very serious
implications for food security in Zambia
SAP MONITOR, no. 23, 2000
|
|
Hydro-electric projects and the construction of large dams have
provided much needed energy for export-orientated industrial development.
However, such development has frequently displaced and indeed destroyed
native communities. Many people are forced to migrate to the already
over-populated and heavily polluted cities. The search for work
is often futile: SAPs lead to a reduction in government spending
and the privitisation of state industries and one result of this
is an increase in the level of unemployment.
In the last decade, the World Bank lent to projects that damaged
the environment and put lives at risk. For example, communities
in Bolivia have been exposed to the risk of explosions from Natural
Gas pipelines financed by World Bank loans. Vast amounts of rainforest
in Brazil have been cleared to make way for roads and railways to
facilitate the mining industry. Although the World Bank has begun
to include environmental considerations into its lending policies,
this does not generally apply to SAPs lending.
With its emphasis on export performance and balancing the budget
the IMF tends to neglect environmental considerations. Under IMF
direction Cote d'Ivoire devalued its currency and created incentives
to increase export-based agriculture. Since then, cocoa production
rose by 44 per cent and the forest cover decreased by 33 per cent.
In Asia the farming of prawn and shrimp has been a traditional
practice for hundreds of years. These traditional systems require
few inputs and rely mainly on natural water supplies and tidal flow.
Many indebted Asian governments, under pressure from the World Bank
and IMF, have promoted intensive prawn and shrimp aquaculture. This
practice has now almost entirely replaced traditional methods. Intensive
farming requires a constant supply of saline water together with
fish meal, lime, antibiotics and various chemicals.
In Nicaragua an IMF loan in 1994 focused on increased exports from
fishing, forestry and agriculture. This loan added to an already
heavy pattern of deforestation. When Hurricane Mitch struck Nicaragua,
its effects were exacerbated by widespread deforestation. Much of
the country had become susceptible to very high levels of erosion.
Today over six billion people share the earth's resources. It is
now widely understood that any exploitation of these resources has
implications for everyone. For most of the poorest countries in
the world vulnerability to 'natural' disasters is worsened by the
drastic measures demanded by structural adjustment. The loss of
trees for example takes away a natural barrier to the forces of
wind and rain. Developing countries have borne the brunt of the
increasing number of natural disasters that have occurred over the
past ten years. Between 1990-1998, 94 per cent of the world's disasters
occurred in developing countries. (World Development Report,
World Bank, 2000).
This situation is further exacerbated by the practices of those
in the North. Industries in the North produce waste emissions faster
than nature can absorb them and the earth's natural ability to regenerate
itself may now have been eroded beyond the point of repair. Individual
consumption patterns and lifestyles in the North, are also contributing
to this degradation. Carbon (CO2) has increased in the earth's atmosphere
by 33 per cent. Most of the increase has occurred in recent decades.
This increase in carbon levels has been accompanied by rising global
temperatures. Weather-related catastrophes occurring in tandem with
a rise in global surface temperatures, tripled between the 1960s
and the 1990s with an estimated loss of 41,000 lives and 300 million
people displaced. In 1998 El Nino left its scars in droughts or
floods right across Asia, Africa and South America. In the same
year Hurricane Mitch struck Central America killing 20,000 and displacing
three million. The damage to Honduras is reckoned to be in the region
of $3.8 billion or 70 per cent of the national budget.
In 1992 the Rio Earth Summit recognised that industrialised countries
need to reduce their carbon emissions by 60-80 per cent. In 1997,
the Kyoto Proctocol set preliminary targets for reducing carbon
emissions at 5 per cent of 1990 levels by 2008-2012. Some western
countries are resisting or ignoring even this minimal reduction.
The US currently uses twelve times the allowable amount while Tanzania
uses 22 times less than its quota. In Ireland too, we are way beyond
our limits. An Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) report published
in August 2000, found that in 1998, state emissions here, including
greenhouse gases, were already higher than limits agreed for the
year 2010 under the Kyoto agreement. Since 1990, CO2 emissions in
Ireland have increased by nearly 30 per cent. Ireland also emits
the highest levels of ammonia, methane and other nitrous oxides
per head of population than any other EU country. (Emissions
of Atmospheric Pollutants in Ireland, 1990-1998, EPA, August
2000).
Carbon emissions are just one example of how the North is in reality
severely indebted to the people and countries of the South.
"Rich countries pursue highly indebted countries to service
their foreign financial debt, at great cost to the millions who
subsequently go without vital health and education services. But
industrialised countries are themselves responsible for a much larger
debt to the global community. Their reckless use of fossil fuels
has helped create the spectre of climate change ..it is poor people
in poor countries who suffer first and worst from both extreme weather
conditions connected to climate change, and from the struggle to
service unpayable foreign debts" (Who owes Who?, Christian
Aid )
|
Questions/discussion starters:
What effects do you think the Debt Crisis has
on the environment?
How does the Debt Crisis affect the small farmers
in heavily indebted countries?
If so much of the land is used for cash crops like
coffee and tea, where are the food crops grown?
In what ways does the debt crisis affect food
security?
Does the debt crisis affect women differently
than men?
If many countries following Structural Adjustment
Programmes grow coffee, tea and cocoa for export,
how do you think this affects the prices of these
goods? Who benefits from this?
Why do industrial countries refuse to take action
to reduce carbon emissions?
What about renewable energy sources? India has
recorded a 30 fold increase in the use of wind power
since 1992. Renewable energy sources now provide five
percent of its energy requirement, compared to 0.03
percent in the USA. Why the difference?
|
|
Contributors:
Bet Aalan, Christian Aid
Niamh Gaynor, Jesuits for Debt Relief and Development
Resources:
After the Prawn Rush. The Human and Environmental Cost
of Commercial Prawn Farming. Kevan Bundell & Eileen Manbin.
Christian Aid, 1996
In Debt to Disaster. What happened to Honduras after
Hurricane Mitch. Christian Aid, 1999
Mortagaging the Earth, The World Bank, Environmental
Impoverishment and the Crisis of Development. Bruce Rich, 1994,
Earthscan.
Pick your Poision. The pesticide scandal. New Internationalist
May 2000
SAP Monitor. Zambia, no 23, 2000
State of the World. Lester R Brown & Christiphoer
Flavin. Earthscan, 1999
The Breakdown of Climate. Human Choices or Global Disaster.
Peter Bunyard, Floris Books, 1999
The IMF: Selling the Environment Short. Friends of the
Earth, March 2000
Vital Signs. Earthscan, 1999-2000
Whose Earth? Land and Development. Paul Spray, Christian
Aid, 1992
Who owes Who? Climate Change, debt, equity and survival.
Christian Aid, 1999
World Development Report, World Bank, 2000
Useful Websites:
www.oneworld.org
www.foe.org
www.peopleandplanet.org
www.christain-aid.org.uk
|